KnowledgeCapital

KnowledgeCapital › Docs

Sealed meeting minutes, drafted from the recording

Minutes that are never quietly rewritten, written from the recording of the session — transcribed on your server, summarised locally.

In short. Every team or community meeting carries its minutes. Once recorded for good, they are sealed: nobody can change them, and it is known who sealed them and when. The draft writes itself from the recording of the session: transcribed on your server, summarised by the local engine, with the verbatim kept underneath. The recording then leaves for the archive and off the server.

Minutes are only worth something if you can be sure they have not moved. In teams as in communities, every meeting therefore carries its minutes — and once recorded for good, they are SEALED: no longer editable by anyone, with a trace of who sealed them and when. Before sealing, the draft can be reworked freely.

The draft that writes itself

The system first assembles a FACTUAL draft: participants, agenda, decisions entered during the session. Then, as soon as a recording of the session is available, it completes it in two steps:

The summary carries, in plain words, a note saying it was written by the machine and must be reviewed. That is deliberate: a language model gets things wrong, and sealing remains a human act, named and final.

The box you can untick

Every meeting carries a “the session will be recorded” box, ticked by default. The team lead or the community facilitator unticks it whenever they see fit, before the session. An unticked session refuses the recording — including one a machine would try to deposit. Recording people means telling them: the box is not a decoration.

The recording does not stay on your server

An hour of session weighs around 30 MB in audio and 400 MB in video; the minutes and their transcript, a few dozen kilobytes. The server therefore does not keep recordings: they pass through it. Once the minutes are written, the file leaves for the destination chosen by the person in charge — a folder on another disk, a Nextcloud or WebDAV space — and the local copy is deleted.

An original is never deleted without proof of arrival: the file placed at the destination is read back before the local copy disappears. If the destination does not answer, the recording stays, and the archiving screen says so.

What remains in the minutes weighs nothing: the file name, its size, its SHA-256 fingerprint and the address of the archive. Enough to find the original two years later — and to prove it is the right one.

Without depositing anything by hand

The deposit can be manual — the file is dropped onto the meeting record — or automatic: whatever recorded the session sends the file to the system with the room name, and the minutes are written without anyone touching them.

Try the automatic minutesDrop a meeting recording into the trial space: the transcript is made on the server, the summary composes itself, and all that is left is to review and seal. Open a free trial space (14 days, no card) or request a demonstration.

See also: Self-hosted video conferencing for knowledge transfer · The modules of the knowledge ERP · Security and data confinement · Backups and recovery after an incident · Validated lessons-learned (REX) software

Frequently asked questions

Can sealed minutes still be corrected?

No. Before sealing, the draft can be edited freely; afterwards, nobody can change it, and the trace of who sealed it and when is kept.

Where are the transcript and the summary made?

On your server, by a local engine. Neither the recording nor its text is sent to any outside service.

Can a session be kept from being recorded?

Yes. Every meeting carries a “the session will be recorded” box, which the team lead or the facilitator unticks before the session. An unticked session refuses any deposit, automatic ones included.

Do recordings clutter the server?

No: once the minutes are written they leave for the chosen destination (a folder on another disk, Nextcloud, WebDAV) and the local copy is deleted — never before there is proof the file has arrived.

Is the automatic summary reliable?

It saves time, it does not replace review: the full transcript stays under the summary and is authoritative, and sealing is a human act.

Docs